Biotechnology and Genetic Resource Policies // Brief 3 // Intellectual Property And Developing Countries: Freedom To Operate In Agricultural Biotechnology
by Philip G. Pardey, Brian D. Wright, Carol Nottenburg, Eran Binenbaum, and Patricia Zambrano (International Food Policy Research Institute)
Discuss this publicationShare your views with other visitors, and read what they have to say
In agricultural biotechnology, the key technologies protected as intellectual property are highly concentrated in the hands of a small number of large, multinational corporations based in North America and Western Europe (“the North”). Although many developing countries (“the South”) lack the capacity to adopt these technologies, a system of international and national agricultural research centers has used them to make genetic improvements benefiting the vast majority of poor consumers. Concern is arising in the worldwide agricultural research community that the very intellectual property rights (IPRs) that have been associated with the surge of private research in biotechnology now threaten to block access to new developments to public and nonprofit researchers. This concern about current developing-country access to essential intellectual property is exaggerated and largely misdirected. The relationship between IPRs and agricultural research in developing countries is poorly understood. International and national agricultural research centers currently have far greater freedom to operate—the ability to practice or use an innovation—in agricultural
Add a comment
Enter your details and a comment below, then click Submit Comment. We’ll review and publish the best comments.