Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest • Volume 8 • Number 23 • 30th June 2004

SPS Committee: S&D Debate To Continue

Do More

Subscribe to Bridges

* required

Email Address: *

Country: *
Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas, The Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democractic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote D'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) Croatia (Hrvatska) Cuba Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic East Timor Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Islands Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia, The Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard and McDonald Islands Honduras Hong Kong S.A.R. Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran Iraq Ireland Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea Korea, North Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Laos Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau S.A.R. Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia Moldova Monaco Mongolia Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, The New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Panama Papua new Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Island Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Reunion Romania Russia Rwanda Saint Helena Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent And The Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia And The South Sandwich Islands Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard And Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syria Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania Thailand Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Vatican City State (Holy See) Venezuela Vietnam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (US) Wallis And Futuna Islands Yemen Yugoslavia Zambia Zimbabwe

Employment Sector: *

First Name:

Last Name:

Organisation:

Enter the letters shown above:*

Download this issue

See also

The WTO Committee on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS) failed again to finalise discussions on special and differential treatment (S&D) following objections by Malaysia at its 22-23 June meeting. Also at the session, Members adopted a schedule for reviewing the operation and implementation of the SPS Agreement as mandated by the Doha decision on implementation.

Transparency in S&D

Members continued discussions on Canada’s proposal on enhancing transparency of special and differential treatment within the SPS Agreement, which would require Members to engage in bilateral consultations if an exporting country identified significant difficulties in complying with proposed regulations (see BRIDGES Weekly, 24 March 2004). Following the consultations, the notifying Member would inform the WTO of the S&D requested and provided (or reasons why S&D was not granted). At the last SPS Committee meeting in March, Members had adopted a revised version of the procedural details put forward by the Secretariat (G/SPS/W/132/Rev.2, searchable at http://docsonline.wto.org/) provided that no objections were raised by 30 April.

Malaysia, however, expressed objections by asking for additional time to consult. Specifically, Malaysia took issue with the paper’s proposal that importing developed countries should consider S&D in response to requests from exporting developing country exporters. Malaysia said it would like to see the onus placed on developed countries instead. In response, Canada noted that the SPS Agreement already obliged developed countries to provide S&D. Canada added that the proposal was meant to address developing countries’ concerns that the S&D did not meet their needs by allowing them to specify the additional S&D they were seeking. Several other countries — including Jamaica, Nicaragua, Eduardo, Cuba, Peru, Brazil and the US — also urged Malaysia to join the consensus. Discussions are set to continue at the next SPS Committee meeting, currently scheduled for 27-28 October.

Schedule for SPS review

Members adopted a schedule for reviewing the operation and implementation of the SPS Agreement. Such a review is mandated to take place at least once every four years pursuant to paragraph 3.4 of the Doha Decision on Implementation-related Issues and Concerns. The report of the next review should be prepared for the sixth WTO Ministerial Conference. According to the schedule, Members are requested to submit to the Secretariat issues that they would like to see considered in the review. The report is tentatively scheduled to be adopted in June 2005.

The next meeting of the SPS Committee is currently scheduled for 27-28 October. The session will be chaired by Gregg Young (US) who took over from Paul Martin (Canada).

ICTSD reporting.