The Climate Technology Mechanism: Issues and Challenges


by ICTSD

Information Note 18

Discuss this publicationShare your views with other visitors, and read what they have to say

The Climate Technology Mechanism: Issues and Challenges 0.58 MB

The agreement to establish a new Technology Mechanism is one of the concrete outcomes of the Cancun climate change conference (2010) that requires a closer look. The main goal of the Mechanism is to enhance action for technology development and transfer, particularly to developing countries, in support of climate change mitigation and adaptation. It is premised on the recognition that the large-scale deployment and diffusion of these technologies is pivotal to worldwide efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

However, the Mechanism faces many challenges before it can become operational. For instance, it is not clear how well resourced it will be. In addition, many of its functions need to be further ‘fleshed out’ and a number of institutional issues such as the relationship between its two main components – the Technology Executive Committee and the Climate Technology Centre and Network – still need to be agreed.

The objective of this information note is to shed some light on the main features and functions of the Technology Mechanism and on some of these challenges. We hope you find it a useful contribution to ongoing discussions on the operationalisation of the Technology Mechanism in the context of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

One response to “The Climate Technology Mechanism: Issues and Challenges”

  1. Onduri Machulu Fred

    There is need to clearly define the role and the linkages of Technology Executive Committee and technology Center and Network. Looking at their respective mandates calls for establishment of supervisory mechanism. The committee would be responsible for policy guidelines and supervision of the activities of the Center. This makes the management process and reporting easier and more clear. The center should be responsible for the implementation of the policies under the guidelines provided by the Committee. The center reports to the Committee and the Committee reports to the COP. The mnagerial hirarchy becomes more clear and feasible.

  2. Anonymous

Add a comment

Enter your details and a comment below, then click Submit Comment. We’ll review and publish the best comments.

required

required

optional